Disease | spinal stenosis |
Phenotype | C0038016|spondylolisthesis |
Sentences | 32 |
PubMedID- 25890019 | Methods: in this retrospective analysis, 27 patients of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis underwent reduction using polyaxial screw and rod constructs and posterolateral fusion. |
PubMedID- 22696995 | The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the radiological and clinical outcome after treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis l4l5 with or without spondylolisthesis, with either posterior lumbar interbody fusion (plif) (26 patients) or dynesys posterior stabilization (27 patients). |
PubMedID- 24325880 | Purpose: the primary purpose of this study is to assess whether improvements in hrqol after surgical management of focal lumbar spinal stenosis (flss) with or without spondylolisthesis are sustainable over the long term compared with that of tha/tka for oa. |
PubMedID- 25810864 | Lumbar spine mr imaging showed spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis at l4-5. |
PubMedID- 22545019 | Degenerative spondylolisthesis with concomitant spinal stenosis is among the most frequent conditions in the aging adult spine. |
PubMedID- 23403827 | Treatment of multilevel degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis using a combination of microendoscopic discectomy and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. |
PubMedID- 25668333 | Study design: subgroup analysis of the lumbar spinal stenosis (lss) without degenerative spondylolisthesis diagnostic cohort of the spine patient outcomes research trial multicenter randomized clinical trial with a concurrent observational cohort. |
PubMedID- 23326673 | They reported a minimum four-year followup of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with dynesys and decompression. |
PubMedID- 22949963 | In this study group, device was applied for ddd in 29 patients (44.6%), spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis in 16 patients (24.6%), degenerative spinal stenosis in 9 patients (13.8%), adjacent segment disease (asd) after fusion in 6 patients (9.2%), and spinal stenosis with degenerative lumbar scoliosis in 5 patients (7.7%) (table 1). |
PubMedID- 20809452 | Background: decompression and spinal fusion have been generally recommended for spinal stenosis associated with low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis (ds), although this is still controversial. |
PubMedID- 22708014 | In case of spinal stenosis associated with spondylolisthesis (meyerding type i) [25], we performed decompressive surgery alone [20]. |
PubMedID- 22173610 | Materials and methods: a total of 80 patients received single-level plf for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. |
PubMedID- 22526708 | Introduction and materials: we examined lumbar transpedicular instrumented posterolateral fusion patients operated on between 1992 and 1997 presenting: degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis; adult isthmic spondylolisthesis; failed back syndrome after one to five discectomies; and failed back syndrome after one to three laminectomy operations (groups 1-4, respectively). |
PubMedID- 25433058 | Purpose: the long-term results of decompressive surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis were evaluated retrospectively with regard to the postoperative progression of slippage and clinical symptoms. |
PubMedID- 24532522 | Furthermore, some authors have reported a discrepancy between bone union and clinical results in patients with spinal stenosis associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, and good results in nonunion cases.11,12 in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis, lbp can originate from intervertebral discs, facet joints, and spinal nerve roots. |
PubMedID- 23591654 | The type of stenosis grading the highest burden of back pain was spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis (ratio = 0.93; [95% confidence interval, ci] = 0.92-0.95), followed by central spinal stenosis (ratio = 0.88; [95% ci] = 0.88-0.89). |
PubMedID- 24024179 | The degenerative spondylolisthesis can subsequently lead to severe spinal stenosis due to the progressive slip. |
PubMedID- 23091736 | In spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis, decompression and fusion are widely recommended. |
PubMedID- 23169068 | Methods: the results from a multicenter randomized and observational study, the spine patient outcomes research trial comparing multilevel decompression and single-level fusion and multilevel decompression and multilevel fusion for spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis, were analyzed. |
PubMedID- 23681497 | The following conditions were included: disc herniation, spondylolisthesis, and ddd with or without spinal stenosis. |
PubMedID- 25579423 | Background context: prior studies have demonstrated the superiority of decompression and fusion over decompression alone for the treatment of lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. |
PubMedID- 20302667 | Indications for the final surgery in 11 patients were herniated intervertebral disc (hivd) (8 patients; 73%), recurrent hivd (1; 9%), and spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis (2; 18%). |
PubMedID- 21508884 | Methods: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter clinical study was previously conducted to compare the outcomes of osteogenic protein 1 (bmp-7) putty to autogenous iliac crest bone graft for single-level non-instrumented posterolateral fusion for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. |
PubMedID- 21748046 | Fifty-two (70%) had lumbar spinal stenosis with a spondylolisthesis, sixteen (21%) had radiculopathy with foraminal stenosis associated with disc space foreshortening and facet arthropathy, and six (8%) had recurrent disc herniation. |
PubMedID- 25983845 | Out of 17 patients, 7 patients were degenerative diseases (5 spinal stenosis with instability, 2 spondylolisthesis), 6 patients were infectious diseases (4 pyogenic spondylitis, 2 tuberculous spondylitis) and 4 patients were burst fractures with thecal sac compression and instability (table 1). |
PubMedID- 26217384 | Twenty-two patients had lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis, 47 patients had lumbar spinal stenosis with spondylolisthesis, and 4 patients had spondylolisthesis. |
PubMedID- 24150437 | Preoperative t2-weighted sagittal (a), and axial (b) mr images show l4–l5 grade 1 spondylolisthesis with associated spinal stenosis. |
PubMedID- 20081560 | Methods: the results from a multicenter randomized and observational study, the spine patient outcomes research trial (sport) comparing surgical versus nonoperative treatment for spinal stenosis with or without spondylolisthesis, were analyzed. |
PubMedID- 24173017 | Objective: to evaluate outcome of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without concomitant degenerative spondylolisthesis according to predominance of pain and to analyze the role of spinal fusion in conjunction with decompression in patients with predominant back pain (bp) or leg pain (lp). |
PubMedID- 22530175 | Treatment of degenerative spinal stenosis, with or without spondylolisthesis, with minimally invasive technique preserves stabilizing ligaments, bone, and muscle. |
PubMedID- 26076782 | Introduction: management of degenerative lumbosacral spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis is still controversial. |
PubMedID- 21301893 | A total of 77 lumbar spinal stenosis patients with l4 degenerative spondylolisthesis underwent l4-5 monosegmental posterior instrumented surgery. |
Page: 1